Research
Research interests: Economics of Digitization, IT Productivity, Organizations, and Future of Work
Publications:
"Economies Before Scale: Survival and Performance of Young Plants in the Age of Cloud Computing", with Kristina McElheran, (Forthcoming at Management Science)
Selected Presentations: WISE 2016, Dublin, Ireland; IIOC 2017, Boston; CIST 2017, Houston; NBER Summer Summit 2017; NBER Productivity Lunch Seminar 2017;
Award: The 2019 Strategic Management Society Annual Conference Best Paper Price Final list (Honorable Mention)
"Investment in Cybersecurity Talent: Evidence from Firms’ Responses to Data Breaches", 2024, with Erik Brynjolfsson, Sarah Bana, Sebastian Steffen, and Xiupeng Wang, MISQ
Selected Presentations: 2020 CIST, Virtual; 2021 WISE, Texas Austin; 2022 WEIS, Tulsa Oklahoma
"Your Company Will Need Remote Work as Extreme Weather Gets Worse", 2023, with Erik Brynjolfsson, John Bai, Sebastian Steffen, and Chi Wan, Harvard Business Review
"Proximity and Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from the Introduction of New Airline Routes", 2023, with John Bai and Sifan Zhou, Management Science
Selected Presentations: Department of Management and Human Resources Brown Bag Seminar, UW Madison, 2019; MIT IDE Seminar 2018, Cambridge
"Management Practices and Mergers and Acquisitions", 2022, with John Bai and Matthew Serfling, Management Science
Selected Presentations: Finance, Organizations, and Markets Conference 2018; 2019 Midwest Finance Association Meeting; 2019 SFS Cavalcade
Media Coverage: Columbia Law School Blue Sky Blog
Feature in Tuck Forum for Private Equity and Venture Capital
"How Management Practices Impact M&A Outcomes", 2021, with John Bai and Matthew Serfling, Harvard Business Review
"The Power of Prediction: Predictive Analytics, Workplace Complements, and Business Performance", 2021, with Erik Brynjolfsson and Kristina McElheran, Business Economics
Selected Presentations: MIT IDE Lunch Seminar, April 2020; Keynote Tech Conference, NABE, November 2020; NBER Productivity Lunch Seminar, April 2021; NBER Summer Institute, July 2021
Awards: Winner of 2020 Edward A. Mennis Contributed Papers Award competition, NABE; Winner of 2021 Best Paper Award at Strategic Management Society Annual Conference; Finalist of 2021 CSIG Best Proposal Award for Rigor in Research, Strategic Management Society
Other Publications:
"How to Get More from the Cloud: Three Talent Strategies You’re Probably Neglecting", 2024, with Kenneth Munie, Sebastian Steffen, and Prashant P. Shukla, California Management Review
"Is Social Capital Associated with Individual Social Responsibility? The Case of Social Distancing During the Covid-19 Pandemic", 2022, with John Bai, Shuili Du, and Chi Wan, Empirical Economics
"A resource-based perspective on information technology, policy, and environmental performance", 2015, with Shital Sharma, and Jing Zhang, Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. Phoenix, Arizona: ACM.
Working Papers:
"The Impact of Immigration Policy Shift on the Labor Market of IT Professionals", with Che-Wei Liu, (Second round R&R at Management Science)
IT professionals provide strategic and competitive advantages for firms and countries in today’s digital age. Examining a significant immigration policy shift in the United States during 2017–2020, initiated by the Buy American Hire American executive order, we identified a growing wage disparity between immigrant and American IT professionals. Immigrant IT professionals experienced an average wage growth that was 8.33 percent higher than that of their American counterparts with similar demographic backgrounds and who worked in the same industry, equating to an additional $7,257 per year. This phenomenon is isolated to IT-related occupations and is most pronounced for new immigrants and those originating from countries with a prominent presence in H-1B applications. Further mechanism tests indicate that the main driver of this pattern is the shifting occupational composition of H-1B visa holders through increasing scrutiny in application and a rise in bargaining power among existing immigrant IT professionals. Further evidence in falsification tests argues against alternative explanations, strengthening our findings. Lastly, we provide suggestive evidence that the increased scrutiny and selection of H-1B applicants, and the resulting high denial rates and prevailing wages of H-1B visas are associated with higher exits of smaller businesses in states with high dependence on immigrant workers. These insights underscore the importance of well-informed immigration policies for highly skilled immigrants, preparedness for increased competition in the IT job market, and consideration of potential labor market shifts and market concentration.
"Cloud Computing and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Firms' Labor Demand", with John Bai (Second round R&R at Management Science)
Selected Presentations: Digital Economy Lab, Stanford HAI, 2021; TPRI, BU, 2021; MIT IDE Annual Conference 2022
Media Coverage: MIT Sloan Ideas Made to Matter
CIST 2022 Best Paper Award Nominee
Using novel measures that capture the investment in cloud technology based on firms' labor demand, we show that cloud adoption is associated with significant productivity gains for a large sample of US public firms in the last decade. This finding is robust to a range of cloud-related measures, samples, and specifications controlling for time-varying industry and firm-level transitory shocks. Various methods including control function, dynamic panel, and instrumental variable are further employed to address potential endogenous choices of cloud-related labor demand. Robust results from these methods suggest that the identified productivity-enhancing effect is likely causal. More importantly, by employing the newly developed Difference-in-Differences (DiD) estimator for the staggered roll-out and heterogeneous effects of treatment, we find that the adoption of cloud is associated with about 6.9% higher sales in the long run. This effect is statistically significant, economically large, and increases over time, indicating potential organizational learning and complementary investment. This study is thus among the first to provide large-scale firm-level evidence concerning both short-term and long-term effects of cloud technology on firm performance.
"Digital Resilience: How Work-From-Home Feasibility Affects Firm Performance", with John Bai, Erik Brynjolfsson, Sebastian Steffen, and Chi Wan, (Under Review)
Data: Firm-level WFH index (SSRN)
Media Coverage: MIT Sloan Ideas Made to Matter
We extract data from over 200 million U.S. job postings to construct a firm-level work-from-home (WFH) feasibility index by assessing firms' labor demand. Using a difference-in-differences (DiD) framework, we then demonstrate that firms that have a high pre-pandemic WFH index had significantly better weather the Covid-19 crisis with higher sales, net incomes, stock market return, and lower volatility during the pandemic compared to their industry peers. These results are particularly pronounced for firms in non-essential industries, where WFH feasibility was necessary to continue operation, as well as in non-high-tech industries, where WFH-enabled digital resilience led to larger comparative advantages over competitors. Lastly, we find that firms with lower pre-pandemic WFH feasibility attempted to catch up to their more digitally resilient competitors via greater software investment and IT-related hiring, which establishes the advantages of and the complementarity between digital technologies and WFH practices in today's economy. Our results are robust to a stringent set of empirical specifications, demand and pre-trend controls, fixed effects, and falsification tests, suggesting that the identified effects of this natural experiment are likely causal. The findings in our study imply that firms need to strategically manage the labor composition and digitization of their organizations, and consider that work-from-home practices, besides their many other advantages, are an effective way to hedge against operational risks.
"Strategic Fit of IT resources in the age of cloud computing", with Kristina McElheran, (Under Revision)
Selected Presentations: AI in Strategy Workshop 2019, NYU Stern, New York; MIT IDE Annual Conference 2019, Cambridge, MA; CIST 2019 Seattle, WA; WISE 2019, Munich, Germany
We develop a contingency view of the effect that quasi-fixed strategic commitments and environmental uncertainty have on the performance of this new type of IT resource. We argue that, because public-cloud-based IT emphasizes flexibility over firm-specificity, it should perform best in organizational contexts with high internal and external uncertainty. Owned IT capital should remain important in stable organizational contexts where it can better enhance efficiency. Working with the U.S. Census Bureau, we test these propositions in a large, representative sample of manufacturing incumbents with novel data on production strategy, environmental uncertainty, and detailed IT investment. We find that productivity benefits from public cloud investment are concentrated among plants with a flexibility-oriented production strategy and that operate in high-uncertainty environments. Owned IT capital remains a better fit for incumbents with low-variance, high-efficiency production, and those facing low external uncertainty. The complementary know-how needed to achieve strategic IT alignment varies by the type of IT, and plants shift their IT investments in the direction of better fit over time, consistent with investments in and learning about dynamic alignment.
"Information Technology, Firm Size, and Industrial Concentration", with Erik Brynjolfsson and Xiupeng Wang (Under Revision)
Media Coverage: Chicago Booth Promarket
Information flows, and thus information technology (IT) are central to the structure of firms and markets. Using data from the U.S. Census Bureau, we provide firm-level evidence that increases in IT intensity are associated with increases in firm size and concentration in both employment and sales. Results from instrumental variables and long-difference models suggest that the effect is likely causal. The effect of IT on size is more pronounced for sales than employment, which leads to a decline in the labor share, consistent with the ``scale without mass'' theory of digitization. Furthermore, we find that IT provides greater benefits to larger firms by increasing their capability to replicate their operations across establishments, markets, and industries. Our findings provide empirical evidence suggesting that the substantial rise in IT investment is one of the main driving forces for the increase in firm size, decline of labor share, the growth of superstar firms, and increased market concentration in recent years.
"The Stanford IT Tables: A Suite of Firm and Industry Metrics for Technology Use", with Erik Brynjolfsson and Sebastian Steffen, (Prepare for submission)
Data can be downloaded at: https://digitaleconomy.stanford.edu/publications/ittables/
In light of the increased prevalence of new information technologies, such as cloud computing and machine learning, traditional IT measures based on physical IT capital have become less reliable, while IT complementary skills, tools, and human capital have become the new bottleneck. New IT technologies have thus, somewhat paradoxically, made the measurement of industry and firm-level IT sophistication and productivity significantly harder than they already were. We, therefore, build a novel set of industry-level IT metrics based on demands for IT skills and occupations in job postings from 2010 until 2022. By making these data publicly available to the IT research community, we believe that we can breathe new life into research using IT metrics to address various research questions. Our methodology to define these measures is general and simple enough to allow for future, and backward-compatible, extensions. We plan to build and release future versions in correspondence with the IT community. Strong correlations with the ‘official’ productivity measures validate our approach at the industry level and suggest their usefulness at the firm level, where no official measures for the US economy currently exist.
"Privacy vs. Profit: The Economic Costs of Personal Information Protection", with Sipeng Zeng and Tianshu Sun (Prepare for submission)
In today’s data-driven economy, personal information has become one of the most critical assets for businesses. However, rising privacy concerns have prompted the introduction of stringent regulations worldwide. This study examines the economic impact of China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL), one of the broadest Chinese privacy regulations introduced in 2021. Using a difference-in-differences (DiD) research design and firm-level data from recruitment and financial databases, we find that firms with higher ex-ante data talent intensity experienced significant declines in key performance metrics following the PIPL’s enactment. Economically, a 1% higher pre-regulation data talent recruitment is associated with a 0.3% decline in firms’ revenues post-regulation, equivalent to approximately an average revenue loss of RMB 36 million per firm. This implies an estimated over RMB 34.8 billion in losses for publicly listed firms in the sample. These effects are particularly severe in B2C sectors, where firms’ reliance on personal data is critical, while cross-border data flow restrictions show less discernible impacts. Notably, firms with a greater proportion of analytics talent can mitigate these negative effects better. This underscores the important role of analytics expertise, providing a potential remedy for firms to navigate the increasingly stringent regulatory environment. Our study thus contributes to the growing literature on data governance, privacy regulation, and firm performance, providing valuable insights for academics and business leaders on managing the balance between regulatory compliance and business performance in the digital age.
"The Effects of Technology Adoption on Firms, Supply Chains, and Rivals", with John Bai, Kristina McElheran, and Ryan Williams, (Under Revision)
Selected Presentations: WISE 2017, Seoul, South Korea
We study the effects of technological change and adoption timing on firms’ liquidity management practices and subsequent product market outcomes. We first posit that investment in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software improves trade credit and inventory efficiencies between supply chain partners. We identify exogenous variation in the timing of a firm’s incentives to implement ERP by using a firm’s ex-ante exposure to the Year 2000 bug (Y2K). Our results show that a firm’s average accounts receivable collection period and inventory turnover improve following ERP implementation in the supply chain. Interestingly, this is due to adoption by either the focal firm or its key customer.
"Public Insurance and Corporate Techonology Investment: Evidence from ACA Medicaid Expansion", with John Bai, and Yue Qiu, (Under Revision)
We exploit the implementation of state-level ACA Medicaid expansion to study the effect of public insurance on corporate investment using confidential plant-level data sets from the U.S. Census. We focus on the U.S. manufacturing sector as we have a representative sample covering more than 70% of the US. Manufacturing economy. Our results indicate that the expansion of Medicaid leads to a decrease in both employment and capital investment in the adopted states, particularly new machinery and computer-related spending, at the plant level. This unexpected effect of the ACA Medicaid expansion leads to a decline in total value of shipment and the slowdown of productivity for plants located in the treated states and henceforth might have a long-term consequence on the overall economy and welfare distribution across states.
Work-in-Progress:
"Data-Driven Performance Pay and Promotion practices", 2020, with Erik Brynjolfsson, Kristina McElheran, Scott Ohlmacher, and Mu-Jeung Yang, Coming soon
Selected Presentations: Empirical Management Conference 2018, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA
How does data-driven decision-making (DDD) shape performance pay and promotion policies? We analyze this question for a sample of over 30,000 US manufacturing establishments. To estimate causal effects, we exploit exogenous variation from government-mandated collection of data. We find that more intensive use of DDD increases the pervasiveness of performance pay and increases the number of targets as well as the granularity of performance metrics that performance pay is based on. Surprisingly, we find that DDD also induces a shift away from ability/performance-based towards seniority-based promotion policies. We provide evidence that this shift towards seniority-based promotion policies is consistent with recent dynamic models of optimal seniority-based promotions.
"Estimating the Consumer Surplus of Cloud Computing", with Georgios Petropoulos, Xiupeng Wang, and Frank Li
"IPO Spillover: Evidence from Employee-Household Data", 2021, with John Bai
"Technology Adoption and Entrepreneurship: Micro-level Evidence", 2021, with John Bai
"Information Technology, Management Practices, and Firms' Environmental Performance", with John Bai, Shital Sharma, and Belkis Cerrato